When Is a Medicare Audit Win Not a Win?

Generally, in the Medicare claims appeal process, a determination that is favorable to the provider ends the appeal process. Only under very limited circumstances can the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (“CMS”) or its contractors directly appeal a favorable appeal determination. However, there are certain mechanisms that can be used to reopen, review, and change favorable determinations with which CMS disagrees.

The Medicare claims appeal process is a lengthy, complex, and administratively burdensome process for providers. It includes five levels of appeal, the first four of which are directly controlled by CMS or The Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) itself. First is Redetermination by a Medicare Administrative Contractor (“MAC”). Second is Reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor (“QIC”). Third is review by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) employed by the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (“OMHA”), a division of HHS. Fourth is review by the Medicare Appeals Council, another division of HHS. Fifth is review by a federal court.

Where a provider prevails at the ALJ review, a distinct CMS contractor, the Administrative QIC (“AdQIC”) is tasked with reviewing an ALJ decision. Where CMS, through the AdQIC, disagrees with the ALJ, in some limited circumstances, the AdQIC can directly file an appeal of the ALJ decision to the Appeals Council. However, more often the AdQIC will simply “refer” a provider’s victory to the Appeals Council for the Appeals Council to considering review of its “own” accord. The Appeals Council nearly always takes such cases and often overturns the provider’s favorable determination. CMS and/or HHS may also simply direct the ALJ, who is employed by HHS, to change the decision.

CMS also has at its disposal the “reopening” mechanism. While intended to be used for clerical and other obvious errors or for new evidence that was not previously available, Medicare contractors have been known to reopen favorable decisions where there is no error or new evidence, but simply where the Medicare program disagrees with the decision in favor of the provider. While some of these actions are of questionable legality and dubious fairness, a provider’s option is almost always a federal lawsuit, an endeavor that is too expensive and time-consuming for many providers, meaning that the provider may effectively be left without recourse.

While it may seem like CMS has stacked the deck against Medicare providers, and in many ways it has, the provider is not without recourse. Skilled and experienced counsel can help craft appeals that are resilient to these types of challenges.

For over 40 years, Wachler & Associates has represented healthcare providers and suppliers nationwide in a variety of health law matters, and our attorneys can assist providers and suppliers in understanding new developments in healthcare law and regulation. If you or your healthcare entity has any questions pertaining to Medicare audits or healthcare compliance, please contact an experienced healthcare attorney at 248-544-0888 or wapc@wachler.com.